DIVE: 连续流中视觉参与的全双工交互基准测试
DIVE: Benchmarking Full-Duplex Interaction with Visual Engagement in Continuous Streams
Yuhang Chen · Guangyue Liu · Shilong Liu
中文摘要
多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)在语音交互和视频理解方面取得显著进展,但现有流式基准主要评估基于时间戳的因果感知,缺乏对实时交互中持续识别线索及决策响应时机的评估。DIVE 基准旨在评估连续多模态流下的全双工交互与视觉参与,包含六个任务,分为主动干预、持续参与和交互协调三个场景。数据集包含 525 个音视频样本,具备细粒度人工标注和精确时间元数据。评估协议分离响应质量、参与决策和响应时机。实验显示,领先实时模型平均响应延迟低于 1 秒,但平均窗口响应率不超过 53.77%。响应质量因模型和任务而异,适应新到达信息以调整进行中的响应仍具挑战性。
关键要点
- 01现有流式基准侧重时间戳问答,缺乏对实时交互中持续识别线索及响应决策能力的评估。
- 02提出 DIVE 基准,涵盖主动干预、持续参与和交互协调三个场景,包含 525 个带细粒度标注的音视频样本。
- 03实验表明领先实时模型平均响应延迟低于 1 秒,但平均窗口响应率不超过 53.77%。
- 04模型在适应新到达信息以调整进行中的响应方面表现较差,响应质量在不同任务和模型间差异显著。
解读
尚无解读。
原始英文摘要
arXiv:2610.28405v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have substantially improved spoken interaction and video understanding. Existing online and streaming benchmarks primarily assess causal multimodal perception through timestamped question answering, whereas real-world interaction requires models to continuously identify task-relevant multimodal cues and decide whether, when, and how to respond. This leaves open how well current models can sustain real-time interaction throughout an evolving multimodal stream. To address this gap, we introduce DIVE, a benchmark for evaluating full-duplex interaction with visual engagement under continuous and realistic multimodal streams. It organizes six tasks into three complementary interaction scenarios. (1) Proactive Intervention evaluates whether models can identify emerging visual or semantic cues and intervene at the appropriate moment. (2) Continuous Engagement evaluates sustained participation through continuous visual tracking and visually grounded query interaction. (3) Interaction Coordination evaluates how models coordinate listening and speaking under overlapping and multi-party interactions. DIVE contains 525 audio/video samples with fine-grained human annotations and precise temporal metadata. Its evaluation protocol separates response quality, participation decisions, and response timing. We evaluate representative real-time models using response quality, window response rates, and reaction latency. Experiments show that leading real-time models achieve sub-second average response latency, yet their average window response rates remain at or below 53.77%. Response quality varies substantially across models and tasks, with adapting ongoing responses to newly arriving information remaining particularly challenging. We hope DIVE facilitates progress toward more natural and capable real-time multimodal interactive systems.