跳到正文
返回论文列表
cs.AI提交于 已译

本体引导的多智能体推理用于可解释的鉴别诊断

Ontology-guided multi-agent reasoning for explainable differential diagnosis

Roxana Ramona Szomiu · George Ursu · Adrian Groza

中文摘要

有效的鉴别诊断依赖于结构清晰且无歧义的患者病例描述,不完整或模糊的临床信息易导致诊断错误。大语言模型(LLMs)在医疗问答中表现良好,但常依赖训练数据中的模式识别而非基于临床证据,且推理过程不透明。为此,提出一种本体引导的多智能体鉴别诊断框架,模拟医生的迭代推理过程。该框架基于专家整理的结构化医学知识库,将诊断分解为显式、可审计的推理步骤,限制推理仅基于有证据支持的关联,从而减少幻觉并提高透明度和一致性。系统还能识别最具区分度的缺失症状并生成针对性追问,以模拟临床询问过程降低不确定性。这些组件共同提升了AI辅助鉴别诊断的可靠性、可解释性和准确性。源代码已公开。

关键要点

  1. 01现有LLM医疗推理依赖模式识别且过程不透明,缺乏基于临床证据的支撑,难以评估推荐依据。
  2. 02提出本体引导的多智能体框架,利用结构化医学知识库将诊断分解为显式、可审计的推理步骤。
  3. 03通过本体约束推理路径,减少幻觉,提高诊断的透明度、可追溯性和一致性。
  4. 04系统能识别关键缺失症状并生成针对性追问,模拟临床询问过程以有效降低诊断不确定性。

解读

尚无解读。

原始英文摘要

arXiv:2610.36325v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Effective differential diagnosis depends on well structured and unambiguous patient case descriptions, since incomplete or ambiguous clinical information readily leads to diagnostic errors and inconsistent reasoning. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown promising capabilities in medical question answering and clinical reasoning; however, even when achieving competitive performance on medical benchmarks, they often rely on pattern recognition learned from training data rather than grounded clinical evidence, and can generate plausible yet unsupported diagnostic conclusions. Their reasoning remains largely opaque, making it difficult for clinicians to assess the evidence and rationale behind a given recommendation. To address this gap, we propose an ontology-guided, multiagent differential diagnosis framework that replicates the iterative reasoning process of physicians. The framework grounds diagnostic inference in a structured, expert-curated medical knowledge base, enabling interpretation of symptoms, clinical findings, or disease relationships, while decomposing diagnosis into explicit, auditable reasoning steps. This ontology-based grounding constrains inference to evidence-backed associations, reducing hallucination and improving diagnostic transparency, traceability, and consistency. The system then identifies the most discriminative missing symptoms and generates targeted follow-up questions to reduce uncertainty through a process that mirrors to clinical inquiry. Together, these components improve the reliability, explainability, and diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted differential diagnosis. The source code is publicly available.

同方向论文 · cs.AI

查看全部 →

反向发现 · 这篇论文相关的工具与提示词

去交叉发现 →

关联提示词 · 6

研究github.com/f/awesome-chatgpt-prompts·外部收录·

1Sentence Deck: pitch deck thesis interview

You are running the 1Sentence Deck method from 1sentencedeck.com. Follow it exactly. Interview me using the method’s own questions, one at a time. Wait for my answer before the next question. Never invent numbers or facts for me. The questi…