跳到正文
返回论文列表
cs.AI提交于 已译

OA-RAG: 基于本体的智能体 RAG 用于忠实 LLM 推理

OA-RAG: Ontology-based Agentic RAG for Faithful LLM Reasoning

Hui Yang · Jiaoyan Chen · Yongsheng Gao

中文摘要

大语言模型(LLMs)在真实任务中表现良好,但易产生幻觉,限制了其在生物医学等需基于既定知识领域的可靠性。检索增强生成(RAG)通过引入外部信息缓解此问题,但常忽视逻辑关系并依赖 LLM 自身推理,可能损害答案忠实性。OA-RAG 是一种结合形式化推理与 LLM 推理的智能体,利用领域本体(ontology)的逻辑结构和非正式注释。对每个答案,OA-RAG 报告作为证据的本体观察及模型评估的接地级别(entailed, supported, related, or unrelated),以表征证据强度。在源自三个大规模本体和六个真实医疗问答任务的基准测试中,OA-RAG 在评估的本体微调及流行 RAG 方法中取得最佳整体性能,在推理密集型任务上表现尤为突出。报告的接地级别为答案可靠性提供了有用指示,较强的接地通常与更高的准确率相关。结果还展示了本体作为知识源的价值:OA-RAG 与依赖教科书等来源的领域特定 RAG 系统具有竞争力,有时甚至表现更优。

关键要点

  1. 01现有 RAG 方法常忽视逻辑关系并过度依赖 LLM 自身推理,导致答案忠实性受损。
  2. 02提出 OA-RAG 智能体,整合形式化推理与 LLM 推理,利用本体的逻辑结构和非正式注释。
  3. 03OA-RAG 报告本体观察证据及接地级别(entailed, supported, related, or unrelated)以表征证据强度。
  4. 04在三个大规模本体和六个医疗问答任务基准中,OA-RAG 取得最佳整体性能,推理密集型任务表现突出。
  5. 05较强的接地级别通常与更高的准确率相关,本体作为知识源可与领域特定 RAG 系统竞争。

解读

尚无解读。

原始英文摘要

arXiv:2610.36335v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) perform well across many real-world tasks but remain prone to hallucination, limiting their reliability in domains such as biomedicine and healthcare, where answers must be grounded in established knowledge. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) mitigates this problem by incorporating external information, but often overlooks logical relationships and relies heavily on the LLM's own reasoning, which can compromise answer faithfulness. We propose OA-RAG, an agent that integrates formal reasoning with LLM reasoning, drawing on both the logical structure and informal annotations of domain ontologies. For each answer, OA-RAG reports the ontology observations used as evidence and a model-assessed grounding level (entailed, supported, related, or unrelated) that characterises the strength of that evidence. Across benchmarks derived from three large-scale ontologies and six real-world medical question-answering tasks, OA-RAG achieves the best overall performance among the evaluated ontology-fine-tuned and popular RAG methods, with particularly strong results on reasoning-intensive tasks. The reported grounding levels also offer a useful indication of answer reliability, with stronger grounding generally associated with higher accuracy. Finally, our results demonstrate the value of ontologies as knowledge sources: OA-RAG is competitive with, and sometimes outperforms, domain-specific RAG systems that draw on sources such as textbooks.

同方向论文 · cs.AI

查看全部 →

反向发现 · 这篇论文相关的工具与提示词

去交叉发现 →

关联提示词 · 6