跳到正文
返回论文列表
cs.AI提交于 已译

Ramanujan Challenge 结果:面向多格式证明的 AI 辅助评估流水线

Ramanujan Challenge Results: AI-Assisted Evaluation Pipeline for Multi-Format Proofs

Alan Sorani · Ashvni Narayanan · Michael Shalyt · Tali Monderer · Rotem Kalisch · Hila Barkan · et al.

中文摘要

随着 AI 数学能力快速提升,有意义的基准正从大学水平问题和数学奥林匹克转向研究级数学。Ramanujan Challenge 是一个由数论研究级问题构成的基准,包含未发表结果和开放猜想。它给出数学常数的具体公式,其正确性可数值检验,而证明可能需要非显然的数学。本文分析该挑战的提交,衡量不同 AI 模型、计算机代数系统(CAS)和形式化工具的相对成功率。发现与官方解答概念上不同的正确提交,以及一个已发表开放猜想的证明。评估提交暴露了第二个挑战:大规模可靠评判复杂证明。引入 AI 辅助评估流水线,面向自然语言证明、CAS 代码和 Lean 形式化,评估语义与逻辑正确性。与常规一次性 LLM 评判相比,流水线将自然语言证明的假阳性判定从 23% 降至 6%,并将支撑代码的判定准确率从 46% 提升至 58%。该方法为大规模评估研究级数学提供方法论,并可能应用于数学和 AI for science。

关键要点

  1. 01Ramanujan Challenge 是研究级数论基准,含未发表结果与开放猜想,正确性可数值检验。
  2. 02分析提交衡量不同 AI 模型、CAS 和形式化工具的相对成功率,发现概念不同的正确解。
  3. 03提交中出现一个已发表开放猜想的证明。
  4. 04AI 辅助评估流水线将自然语言证明假阳性从 23% 降至 6%,代码判定准确率从 46% 升至 58%。
  5. 05方法为大规模评估研究级数学提供路径,可扩展至数学与 AI for science。

解读

尚无解读。

原始英文摘要

arXiv:2610.40551v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI's mathematical capabilities rapidly improve, meaningful benchmarks are shifting from university-level problems and math olympiads to research-level mathematics. The Ramanujan Challenge is a benchmark comprised of research-level problems in number theory, including unpublished results and open conjectures. It presented concrete formulas for mathematical constants whose correctness can be checked numerically, while their proofs may require non-obvious mathematics. Here, we analyze the Challenge submissions, measuring the relative success of different AI models, Computer Algebra Systems (CAS), and formal tools. We find correct submissions that are conceptually distinct from the official solutions, and a proof of one of the published open conjectures. Evaluating the submissions exposed a second challenge: judging complex proofs reliably at scale. We introduce an AI-assisted evaluation pipeline for natural language proofs, CAS code, and Lean formalizations that assesses semantic and logical correctness. Compared with the conventional one-shot LLM judgment, our pipeline reduces false-positive verdicts on natural language proofs from 23% to 6% and improves judgment accuracy on supporting code from 46% to 58%. This approach provides a methodology for evaluating research-level mathematics at scale, with potential applications across mathematics and AI for science.

同方向论文 · cs.AI

查看全部 →

反向发现 · 这篇论文相关的工具与提示词

去交叉发现 →

关联提示词 · 1