跳到正文
返回论文列表
cs.AI提交于 已译

ReuScope:审计 Capsule Vision 2024 中的数据复用与评估敏感性

ReuScope: Auditing Data Reuse and Evaluation Sensitivity in Capsule Vision 2024

Eunseob Choi · Kyeonghun Kim · Hyuk-Jae Lee · Nam-Joon Kim

中文摘要

开发 ReuScope 协议,用于审计数据复用与评估敏感性,以 Capsule Vision 2024 为案例。该协议结合数据关系测量与两组对比:固定预测改变评估人群,以及固定评估改变训练数据。字节完全相同的文件跨越公开训练-验证边界,所有贡献帧的 41 个 Kvasir-Capsule 录制均出现在两个分区中。共享源录制建立跨分割重叠;缺失跨录制患者标识符导致无法统计唯一共享患者。在十个配对种子下,移除所有归因于 Kvasir-Capsule 的训练行,以及来自其他来源、被标记为与其近似的五行,使公开验证平衡准确率从 82.5% 降至 61.2%。在相同拟合模型上评估其他来源的验证行时,比较结果反转:移除使平衡准确率提高 1.38 个百分点。公开验证的下降衡量的是对来源移除的敏感性,而非泄漏导致的膨胀量。匹配对照表明,样本量和类别计数本身不能解释观察到的分数差异。一项探索性实验移除与验证帧有接近训练匹配的训练邻居,或移除同等数量的远距离训练行,相对于匹配的未标记帧,得到双重差分估计为真实类别概率 -0.355 个百分点;准确率的配对 t 区间跨越零。该流程区分了观察到的复用与条件性能敏感性,并为每个结论指定了人群、类别支持和不确定性单位。

关键要点

  1. 01问题:Capsule Vision 2024 存在跨训练-验证分割的数据复用,但缺乏区分复用与性能敏感性的审计方法。
  2. 02方法:ReuScope 协议结合数据关系测量与固定预测/固定评估的两组对比,并设置匹配对照。
  3. 03结果:移除 Kvasir-Capsule 训练行使公开验证平衡准确率从 82.5% 降至 61.2%,但其他来源验证行上移除反使准确率提高 1.38 个百分点。
  4. 04结果:探索性双重差分估计真实类别概率为 -0.355 个百分点,准确率配对 t 区间跨越零。
  5. 05局限:缺失跨录制患者标识符,无法统计唯一共享患者;公开验证下降仅反映来源移除敏感性,非泄漏膨胀量。

解读

尚无解读。

原始英文摘要

arXiv:2610.41835v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We develop ReuScope, a protocol for auditing data reuse and evaluation sensitivity, using Capsule Vision 2024 as a case study. It combines measurements of data relationships with two comparisons: changing the evaluation population while holding predictions fixed, and changing training data while holding evaluation fixed. Byte-identical files cross the public training-validation boundary, and all 41 Kvasir-Capsule recordings that contribute frames occur in both partitions. Shared source recordings establish cross-split overlap; missing cross-recording patient identifiers prevent counting unique shared patients. Across ten paired seeds, removing all training rows attributed to Kvasir-Capsule, plus five rows from other sources flagged as near-matches to it, lowers public-validation balanced accuracy from 82.5% to 61.2%. Evaluating the same fitted models on the validation rows of the other sources reverses the comparison: removal improves balanced accuracy by 1.38 percentage points. The public-validation drop measures sensitivity to source removal, not an amount of leakage-induced inflation. Matched controls show that sample size and class counts alone do not explain the observed score differences. An exploratory experiment removes the training neighbors of validation frames that have close training matches, or equally many distant training rows, and yields a difference-in-differences estimate, relative to matched unflagged frames, of -0.355 percentage points in true-class probability; the paired-t interval for accuracy spans zero. The resulting procedure distinguishes observed reuse from conditional performance sensitivity and specifies the population, class support and uncertainty unit for each conclusion.

同方向论文 · cs.AI

查看全部 →