VIAS:面向组织多价值对齐与合规的价值隔离激活引导
VIAS: Value-Isolating Activation Steering for Multi-Value Alignment and Compliance for Organisations
Avni Mittal · Avinash Anand · Dikshant Kukreja · Erik Cambria · Rajiv Ratn Shah · Sandipan Dandapat
中文摘要
组织日益部署需遵循组织价值观的大语言模型智能体。检验激活引导(activation steering)——在生成时向模型内部激活添加向量而不改变权重——能否在仅提示之外提升合规性。多数场景涉及多个价值,故聚焦多价值引导。简单构建这些向量的方法是对比遵循场景所有相关价值的回复与违反这些价值的回复,但不同价值得到几乎相同的向量:它们捕获通用合规信号而非个体价值,限制了组合多价值时的用途。提出价值隔离激活引导(VIAS),对比同一场景在两种提示下的回复:一种列出所有相关价值,另一种省略单个目标价值。仅当目标价值从合规变为不合规且两个回复在其他价值上仍满足最低合规水平时保留该对。在PROTECT(职场合规数据集,每个场景标注21价值分类体系中的相关价值)上评估VIAS。VIAS降低价值向量间重叠,使其更适合多价值引导,但仅此不能独立控制每个价值。结合提示,VIAS在Qwen2.5-7B上对69.6%场景、Mistral-7B上75.2%、Phi-3.5-mini上72.6%的场景符合所有标注价值,三个模型均优于仅提示。
关键要点
- 01问题:现有激活引导构建的价值向量在不同价值间高度相似,捕获通用合规信号而非个体价值,难以组合多价值。
- 02方法:VIAS通过对比列出全部相关价值与省略单个目标价值的提示回复,仅保留目标价值合规性翻转且其他价值仍达标的样本对。
- 03结果:在PROTECT数据集上,VIAS降低价值向量重叠,结合提示使Qwen2.5-7B、Mistral-7B、Phi-3.5-mini分别有69.6%、75.2%、72.6%场景符合所有标注价值。
- 04局限:降低向量重叠本身不足以实现对每个价值的独立控制。
解读
尚无解读。
原始英文摘要
arXiv:2611.03518v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organisations increasingly deploy large language model agents that must follow organisational values. We check whether activation steering, which adds vectors to a model's internal activations during generation without changing its weights, can improve compliance beyond prompting alone. Since most scenarios involve several values at once, we focus on multi-value steering. A simple way to build these vectors is to contrast responses that follow all values relevant to a scenario with responses that violate them. However, this gives nearly identical vectors for different values: they capture a general compliance signal rather than individual values, which limits their use when combining several values. We propose Value-Isolating Activation Steering (VIAS), which contrasts responses to the same scenario under two prompts, one listing all relevant values and one omitting a single target value. We keep a pair only if the target value changes from compliant to non-compliant and both responses still meet a minimum compliance level on the other values. We evaluate VIAS on PROTECT, a workplace compliance dataset where each scenario is tagged with relevant values from a 21-value taxonomy. VIAS reduces overlap between value vectors, making them better suited for multi-value steering, although this alone does not lead to independent control over each value. Combined with prompting, VIAS complies with every tagged value on 69.6% of scenarios for Qwen2.5-7B, 75.2% for Mistral-7B, and 72.6% for Phi-3.5-mini, outperforming prompting alone for all three models.