PCFBench:大型视觉语言模型在物理感知光子逆向设计中能走多远?
PCFBench: How Far Can Large Vision-Language Models Go in Physics-aware Photonic Inverse Design?
Shengchao Chen · Ting Shu · Sufen Ren
中文摘要
光子晶体光纤(PCF)支撑电信、传感和高功率激光输送等关键应用,但设计仍依赖人工操作和专家经验,需要结合几何直觉与深层波导物理。视觉语言模型(VLM)为自动化PCF设计带来希望,但从显微图像进行光子物理推理仍是挑战。PCFBench是首个综合评估VLM在光子逆向设计流程中感知、推理与决策能力的基准,包含26项任务,按认知需求递增分为几何感知、物理理解、文本生成、多模态推理、逆向设计决策和代码生成六类,基于18个结构多样光纤家族的超过220K个FDTD仿真样本构建。评估涵盖单个VLM的独立任务表现,以及多智能体系统(MAS)从感知到设计的完整顺序流程。结果显示明显的感知—设计鸿沟:现有模型能以中等成功率识别光纤几何,却难以将视觉理解转化为物理感知的设计行动。串联智能体还会导致误差传播,上游感知错误会叠加为下游设计失败。单纯扩大模型规模或简单连接智能体并不足以弥合差距,闭环设计需要明确的物理基础。
关键要点
- 01现有VLM能识别光纤几何,但难以转化为物理感知的设计决策。
- 02PCFBench覆盖六类26项任务,认知需求逐级提升。
- 03基准使用18个光纤家族、超过220K个FDTD仿真样本。
- 04多智能体流程存在显著误差传播,上游错误会累积至下游设计。
- 05扩大模型规模或简单串联智能体不足以解决闭环设计问题。
解读
尚无解读。
原始英文摘要
arXiv:2610.32485v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Photonic crystal fibers (PCFs) underpin critical applications in telecommunications, sensing, and high-power laser delivery, yet their design remains a manual, expert-intensive process that couples geometric intuition with deep waveguide physics. Vision-language models (VLMs) offer a promising path toward automating PCF design, but can they truly reason about photonic physics from microscopy images, or do they merely recognize visual patterns? We introduce PCFBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating VLMs on the perception, reasoning, and decision steps of the photonic inverse-design loop. PCFBench spans 26 tasks organized into six categories of increasing cognitive demand (Geometry Perception, Physics Understanding, Text Generation, Multi-modal Reasoning, Inverse-Design Decision, and Code Generation), built from over 220K FDTD simulation samples across 18 structurally diverse fiber families. We evaluate both individual VLMs on isolated tasks and multi-agent systems (MAS) on the full sequential pipeline from perception to design. Our results reveal a striking perception-design gap: current models can identify fiber geometry with moderate success, yet consistently fail to translate that visual understanding into physics-aware design actions. Moreover, cascading agents through the pipeline exposes significant error propagation, where upstream perception mistakes compound into downstream design failures. These findings suggest that neither model scaling nor naive agent chaining suffices, and that closing the loop demands explicit physical grounding. PCFBench provides the community with a rigorous, multi-dimensional testbed to measure progress toward AI-assisted photonic engineering. The project is available at https://pcfbench.github.io/.