跨物品空间与代码空间的并行生成式推荐知识蒸馏
Knowledge Distillation across Item and Code Spaces for Parallel Generative Recommendation
Yixuan Xu · Hailin Liu · Linxiang Peng · Can Yang
中文摘要
基于语义 ID 的生成式推荐将每个物品表示为从语义表征导出的离散代码序列,并通过预测这些代码生成推荐。现有语义 ID 推荐器通常使用观测到的下一物品作为硬标签训练,但这种监督只确定目标,无法明确提供同一用户历史下候选物品的分布信息。序列推荐器可提供这种物品级预测知识,然而教师与学生分别工作在物品空间和代码空间,知识迁移面临困难。针对并行语义 ID 推荐器提出两项互补的蒸馏目标;该推荐器同时预测所有代码位置,不依赖自回归前缀。物品分布匹配(IDM)从学生的并行代码预测重建目录级物品分布,并与教师的物品分布对齐。代码边缘匹配(CMM)利用固定的物品到代码映射,将教师的物品概率投影到各代码位置,再将所得代码边缘分布与对应学生输出头匹配。两项目标均迁移教师的软分布知识,同时保留学生的并行预测结构。基准实验表明,两种方法持续优于现有先进方法;平均而言,IDM 将 Recall@10 提升 15.39%,CMM 将 NDCG@10 提升 8.28%。结果说明,在重建物品空间或代码边缘空间进行蒸馏,均可显著增强并行生成式推荐的硬标签监督。
关键要点
- 01现有语义 ID 推荐器的硬标签监督缺少同一用户历史下候选物品的分布信息。
- 02教师与学生分别位于物品空间和代码空间,导致序列推荐知识难以迁移至语义 ID 生成。
- 03物品分布匹配从并行代码预测重建目录级分布,并与教师物品分布对齐。
- 04代码边缘匹配通过固定物品到代码映射,将教师概率投影并匹配至各代码位置。
- 05两种蒸馏方法均优于现有先进方法,IDM 与 CMM 分别提升 Recall@10 和 NDCG@10。
解读
尚无解读。
原始英文摘要
arXiv:2610.32943v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative recommendation with semantic IDs represents each item as a sequence of discrete codes derived from its semantic representation and predicts these codes to generate recommendations. Existing semantic-ID recommenders are typically trained with hard labels for the observed next item. Although such supervision identifies the target, it provides no explicit distributional information about alternative items conditioned on the same user history. Sequential recommenders can supply this item-level predictive knowledge, but transferring it to semantic-ID generation is challenging because the teacher and student operate in item and code spaces, respectively. We propose two complementary knowledge-distillation objectives for parallel semantic-ID recommenders, which predict all code positions simultaneously without autoregressive prefix conditioning. Item Distribution Matching (IDM) reconstructs a catalogue-level item distribution from the student's parallel code predictions and aligns it with the teacher's item distribution. Code Marginal Matching (CMM) projects the teacher's item probabilities onto each code position using fixed item-to-code assignments, then matches the resulting code marginals to the corresponding student heads. Both objectives transfer the teacher's soft distributional knowledge while preserving the student's parallel prediction structure. Experiments on benchmark datasets show that both methods consistently outperform existing state-of-the-art approaches. On average, IDM improves Recall@10 by 15.39%, while CMM improves NDCG@10 by 8.28%. These results demonstrate that distillation in either reconstructed item space or code-marginal space can substantially strengthen hard-label supervision for parallel generative recommendation.