边缘辅助众包感知的可解释骑行者安全感知
Edge-Assisted Crowdsensing for Explainable Cyclist Safety Perception
Hongsen Cao · Chia-Yen Chiang · Mona Jaber · Meihui Wang · Yasmin Fathy
中文摘要
尽管政策支持主动出行,骑行者死亡率仍居高不下,自动驾驶车辆又增加了混合交通的复杂性。事故统计和多模型检测流程都无法扩展到对路线沿途感知安全的持续监测。提出一种边缘辅助众包感知系统:车把摄像头提供街道级画面,视觉语言模型(VLM)通过单次提示将每帧转为结构化交通属性,可解释提升机(EBM)将其与 OpenStreetMap 道路基础设施和车载运动学数据结合,预测众包的 1-9 安全评分。提取放在网络边缘:最快的自托管模型每帧需 2.49 s,评分在 CPU 上耗时 0.4 ms。在伦敦两条路线的 1,362 帧标注数据上,EBM 回归器在五折交叉验证下达到 72.2% 二分类准确率和 1.011 的平均绝对误差,与黑盒集成模型相差不到一个准确率点。其逐特征形状函数给出精确归因:物理车道隔离值 +0.97 评分点,画线车道 +0.70,施工场地 -0.65。规划者因此可用评分点衡量基础设施改造成本,结果直接进入成本效益分析。还报告了标注者间一致性(alpha = 0.4695)、属性审计,以及将属性误差与准确率关联的敏感性分析。经重新编码,20 s 采样间隔以 54 Mbit/s 服务 1,000 名骑行者,代价为 1.4 个准确率点,使持续监测可行。
关键要点
- 01事故统计与多模型检测难以扩展到路线级感知安全的持续监测
- 02边缘端 VLM 单提示提取交通属性,EBM 结合 OSM 与运动学预测 1-9 安全评分
- 031,362 帧上二分类准确率 72.2%、MAE 1.011,与黑盒集成差距不足一个点
- 04逐特征归因可量化基础设施改造:物理隔离 +0.97、画线车道 +0.70、施工 -0.65
- 0520 s 采样可服务 1,000 名骑行者,代价 1.4 个准确率点
解读
尚无解读。
原始英文摘要
arXiv:2611.08441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cyclist fatality rates remain high despite policy support for active travel, and autonomous vehicles add complexity to mixed traffic. Neither crash statistics nor multi-model detection pipelines scale to continuous monitoring of perceived safety along a route. We present an edge-assisted crowdsensing system: handlebar cameras supply street-level frames, a vision-language model (VLM) turns each frame into structured traffic attributes through a single prompt, and an explainable boosting machine (EBM) combines them with OpenStreetMap road infrastructure and on-bike kinematics to predict a crowdsourced 1-9 safety score. Extraction belongs at the network edge: the fastest self-hosted model needs 2.49 s per frame and scoring takes 0.4 ms on a CPU. On 1,362 annotated frames from two London routes, the EBM regressor reaches 72.2 percent binary accuracy and a mean absolute error of 1.011 under five-fold cross-validation. It is within one accuracy point of black-box ensembles. Its per-feature shape functions give exact attribution: physical lane separation is worth +0.97 rating points, a painted lane +0.70 and a construction site -0.65. Planners can therefore price an infrastructure change in rating points, and the results enter cost-benefit analysis directly. We also report inter-annotator agreement (alpha = 0.4695), an attribute audit, and a sensitivity analysis linking attribute error to accuracy. With re-encoding, a 20 s sampling interval serves 1,000 riders at 54 Mbit/s at a cost of 1.4 accuracy points, making continuous monitoring practical.