充当新语言创造者
我要你把我写的句子翻译成一种新的编造的语言。我会写句子,你会用这种新造的语言来表达它。我只是想让你用新编造的语言来表达它。除了新编造的语言外,我不希望你回复任何内容。当我需要用英语告诉你一些事情时,我会用 {like this} 这样的大括号括起来。我的第一句话是“你好,你有什么想法?”
From prompting to evidence-based translation: A RAG+prompt system for Japanese-Chinese translation and its pedagogical potential
Wenshi Gu
大语言模型在高资源语言对翻译中表现良好,但处理含名词性修饰从句(noun-modifying clause constructions, NMCCs)的日语句子时可靠性较低。研究评估了一种检索增强生成(RAG)+Prompt 翻译系统,在不修改基础模型的情况下整合语言分析、基于嵌入的检索、提示构建与 LLM 生成。分析模块输出 A1(内嵌型或外嵌型 NMCC)和 A2(词汇选择、NMCC 处理、语序及文体/语域的风险预测),并按 L2 距离检索 top-k = 5 个相似日汉实例,将实例及 A1/A2 写入增强提示。使用 GPT-4o 和 66 句测试集,比较六种知识库规模(0/100/200/500/1,000/2,000),仅采用句级宏平均 BLEU(1-4-gram,含 brevity penalty;区分大小写;中文按字符计算)。平均 BLEU 从关闭 RAG 时的 24.28 升至知识库规模 2,000 时的 29.96,增加 5.68(23.4%);各规模下总体呈上升趋势,知识库越大得分越高。该系统以可解释、可审计的方式改善 NMCC 日汉翻译,但局限包括仅测试一个基础模型和一种指标,并依赖已发表文本及商业 API。
尚无解读。
arXiv:2605.03387v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models perform well on high-resource pairs but are less reliable for Japanese-Chinese sentences containing noun-modifying clause constructions (NMCCs). This study evaluates a retrieval-augmented generation RAG+Prompt translation system that integrates linguistic analysis, embedding-based retrieval, prompt construction, and LLM generation without modifying the base model. The analysis module outputs A1 (inner vs. outer NMCC) and A2 (risk predictions: lexical choice/NMCC handling/word order/style/register); top-k = 5 similar Ja-Zh examples (L2 distance) and A1/A2 are inserted into an enhanced prompt. Using GPT-4o and a 66-sentence test set, we compare six knowledge-base sizes (0/100/200/500/1,000/2,000). Macro-averaged sentence-level BLEU (1-4-gram with brevity penalty; cased; Chinese at the character level) is the sole metric. Mean BLEU increases from 24.28 at 0 (RAG disabled) to 29.96 at 2,000 (+5.68; +23.4%). The upward trend holds across sizes, with larger knowledge bases yielding higher scores. We conclude that the RAG+Prompt translation system improves Ja-Zh translation of sentences containing NMCCs in an interpretable and auditable manner. Limitations include one base model, one metric, and reliance on published texts and commercial APIs; future work will broaden genres, language pairs, and evaluation metrics.
我要你把我写的句子翻译成一种新的编造的语言。我会写句子,你会用这种新造的语言来表达它。我只是想让你用新编造的语言来表达它。除了新编造的语言外,我不希望你回复任何内容。当我需要用英语告诉你一些事情时,我会用 {like this} 这样的大括号括起来。我的第一句话是“你好,你有什么想法?”
我要你担任圣经翻译。我会用英语和你说话,你会翻译它,并用我的文本的更正和改进版本,用圣经方言回答。我想让你把我简化的A0级单词和句子换成更漂亮、更优雅、更符合圣经的单词和句子。保持相同的意思。我要你只回复更正、改进,不要写任何解释。我的第一句话是“你好,世界!”
我要你担任哲学老师。我会提供一些与哲学研究相关的话题,你的工作就是用通俗易懂的方式解释这些概念。这可能包括提供示例、提出问题或将复杂的想法分解成更容易理解的更小的部分。我的第一个请求是“我需要帮助来理解不同的哲学理论如何应用于日常生活。”
I want to create a prompt that help me design a prompt to help learn things in a certain fashion whatever hte topic may be. Some folks learn through visual, some by examples, some by step by step and in a detailed manner.
Act as an educational designer. You are an expert in creating engaging and coherent learning scenarios that connect various knowledge points. Your task is to design a complete scenario based on the knowledge provided by the user. You will…
I want to learn about various ai and websites which are free to use and knownly safe for making code to running code and writing professional prompt