跳到正文
返回论文列表
cs.CL提交于 已译

PubMedCausal: 用于生物医学文本因果关系抽取的跨度级标注语料库

PubMedCausal: A Span-Level Annotated Corpus for Causal Relation Extraction in Biomedical Text

Ifeoluwa Kunle-John · Josiah Paul · Oluwatosin Agbaakin · Peter Aina · Ikenna Odezuligbo · Sydney Anuyah

中文摘要

因果关系抽取(CRE)是生物医学文本挖掘的核心,但现有资源常混淆因果与广义关联,或局限于句子级标注及显性线索,限制了模型评估的有效性。基于 PubMed 摘要构建了 PubMedCausal 语料库,包含 30,000 个段落级行,其中 3,945 个因果行和 6,491 个经裁决的因果对。每个关系均标注全文因果跨度、类型及句内性,支持检测与抽取评估。基准测试显示,生物医学编码器在检测任务中表现最强,PubMedBERT 达到 F1 分数 0.7391;在跨度级抽取中,DeepSeek-R1-32B 配合少样本提示取得 Cosine Pair F1 0.6765。跨数据集迁移测试证实了该资源的通用性。结果表明,类别不平衡、长跨度、隐性因果及提示敏感性使生物医学 CRE 仍具挑战性。

关键要点

  1. 01现有生物医学因果资源常混淆因果与关联,且多限于句子级或显性线索,难以真实评估模型能力。
  2. 02构建 PubMedCausal 语料库,包含 30,000 段落行及 6,491 个因果对,提供全文跨度、类型及句内性标注。
  3. 03PubMedBERT 在因果检测任务中取得 0.7391 的 F1 分数,为当前最强生物医学编码器。
  4. 04DeepSeek-R1-32B 在跨度级抽取任务中达到 0.6765 的 Cosine Pair F1,优于其他生成式基线。
  5. 05类别不平衡、长因果跨度、隐性因果及跨句关系仍是生物医学因果抽取的主要难点。

解读

尚无解读。

原始英文摘要

arXiv:2605.28363v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Causal relation extraction (CRE) is central to biomedical text mining, but current resources often conflate causal relations with broader associations, restrict annotation to sentence-level examples, or focus mainly on explicit causal cues. This limits their usefulness for evaluating whether models can recover causal claims as they are actually expressed in biomedical text. We introduce PubMedCausal, a span-level annotated corpus for biomedical CRE built from PubMed abstracts. The corpus contains 30,000 paragraph-level rows, including 3,945 causal rows and 6,491 adjudicated cause--effect pairs. Each causal relation is annotated with full-text cause and effect spans, causality type, and sententiality, enabling evaluation of both causal detection and full-span causal extraction. We benchmark discriminative encoders and open-source generative models across detection and extraction settings. For causal detection, biomedical encoders are strongest, with PubMedBERT reaching an F$_1$ score of 0.7391. For span-level extraction, the best generative baseline is DeepSeek-R1-32B with few-shot prompting, reaching a Cosine Pair F$_1$ of 0.6765. We further test transfer learning by evaluating PubMedCausal-trained encoders on external causal relation datasets, showing that the resource supports cross-dataset evaluation. Our results show that biomedical CRE remains difficult under class imbalance, long causal spans, implicit causality, inter-sentential relations, and prompt sensitivity. Code and Data can be found here: https://github.com/josiahpaul07/PubMedCausal_Exp

同方向论文 · cs.CL

查看全部 →

反向发现 · 这篇论文相关的工具与提示词

去交叉发现 →

关联提示词 · 2

学习github.com/f/awesome-chatgpt-prompts·外部收录·

Customer Interview Insight Extractor (JSON)

{ "role": "Senior product researcher who turns raw customer interview transcripts into evidence-backed, decision-ready insights", "task": "Read one customer interview transcript (or detailed notes) and extract structured insights as a s…

写作github.com/f/awesome-chatgpt-prompts·外部收录·

Article Summary and Comprehension

Act as an Article Summarizer and Comprehension Expert. You are skilled in extracting key information from written content and providing insightful summaries. Your task is to summarize the article titled '${articleTitle}' and provide a comp…