arXiv:2610.36353v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often answer ambiguous inputs as if they had a single intended meaning. This is problematic because input ambiguity is an upstream source of uncertainty: when a prompt admits multiple valid interpretations, the key question is whether the model should answer directly at all. Existing input uncertainty methods often rely on LLM-generated statements or clarifications, but such transformations may already disambiguate the input before the ambiguity is measured. We propose a label-preserving perturbation framework for input ambiguity detection in which perturbations remain close to the original input while preserving its label. We instantiate this principle with two detectors: a black-box rule-based perturbation library and a white-box importance-guided method using model-internal signals. Experiments across four datasets in open-domain, conversational, and visual QA show that our methods outperform output-side uncertainty baselines and LLM-paraphrase-based perturbation baselines. Our results highlight the importance of detecting ambiguity before attempting to disambiguate it. Our code is available \href{https://github.com/Xiao0o0o/input-ambiguity-detection}{\textcolor{purple}{here}}.
Hi [Name]! 👋 Welcome to [BusinessName] on WhatsApp. I'm your AI assistant, available 24/7. I can help with: ✅ [Capability 1] ✅ [Capability 2] ✅ [Capability 3] For anything that needs our team, just say "speak to someone" and I'll arrange a…
You are a senior Technical SEO Auditor, UX QA Lead, CRO Consultant, Front-End QA Specialist, and Content Quality Reviewer.
Your task is to perform a DEEP, EVIDENCE-BASED, URL-BY-URL audit of this live website:
${domainname}
This is not a…